Test your knowledge and find out how well you picked up the key learnings of Case study 2.
(Don’t worry this is not a pass/fail quiz.)
Quiz Summary
0 of 6 Questions completed
Questions:
Information
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading…
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You must first complete the following:
Results
Results
0 of 6 Questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0)
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Current
- Review
- Answered
- Correct
- Incorrect
-
Question 1 of 6
1. Question
What was the subject of the complaint in this case?
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 2 of 6
2. Question
What clause of the Code did the Authority ask Napp to consider?
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 3 of 6
3. Question
What was Napp’s response to the complaint?
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 4 of 6
4. Question
Did the Panel consider the complaint in relation to health professionals?
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 5 of 6
5. Question
According to the Panel, which clause of the Code required the inclusion of an inverted black triangle symbol on material related to a medicine subject to additional monitoring and intended for a patient taking that medicine?
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 6 of 6
6. Question
According to the Panel, did the complainant establish that the product webpage directed at health professionals was promotional?
CorrectIncorrect